NLS CONGRESS 2021 

22-23 May

Bodily Effects of Language

By Zoom  

Register before April 11 to receive the reduced rate ! 

After this date, the following prices will be applied:

  

Individual rate: 160 €
Rate < 25 years: 80 €

  

NLS Congress presents

Lacan was always interested in topology, because he found in this discipline three-dimensional models for thinking about the difficult question of the bodily effects of language. Nevertheless, his focus was not always the same. As the questions that preoccupied him changed over the years, he used different figures. In his Seminar IX (1961-1962) he used the torus to explain how desire is shaped by a double lack in the confrontation between need and demand. In his Seminar X (1962-1963) he used the Möbius strip to grasp how an extracted object supports the framework of the subject’s phantasmatic reality. And later, in his study of Lol V. Stein (1965), he took the crosscap to situate the object a, as a bodily point that cannot be reflected in the mirror, and that is necessary as a support for the body image: a →  i(a).
 
This unnamable point where inside and outside invert is exactly the point that Anish Kapoor’s art challenges. This very interesting contemporary artist examines the same Lacanian theme of the topology of the body in abstract terms. Consider for example his work Descent into limbo, where he created the blackest hole as possible. “It reads not like a hole in the ground, but like a black carpet sitting on the floor. It is not an empty dark space, but a space full of darkness,” [1] he said. Or consider My Body Your Body where the border between inside and outside becomes problematic. “I’m endlessly obsessed with the question of the interior,” he said. [2] Or: “I'm not interested in self reference, I couldn’t imagine anything more horrible.” [3] His work is not about the ego, but about the impact of language on the body. Indeed, an analysis taken far enough – Anish Kapoor doesn’t make any secret of his own 25-year analysis – can create a distance from what has been one’s horror and can to a certain extent answer the question of how the body is shaped by language.
 
Revised by Joanne Conway

NLS Congrès présente

Lacan s’est toujours intéressé à la topologie car, grâce à celle-ci, il a pu isoler des modèles tridimensionnels pour penser la question complexe des effets corporels de la langue. Pourtant, ses références topologiques n’étaient pas toujours les mêmes. Au fil des années, à partir des questions qu’il abordait, il se servait de figures différentes. Dans son Séminaire IX (1961-1962) Lacan utilise le tore pour montrer que le désir est déterminé par un double manque dans l’articulation entre besoin et demande. Dans son Séminaire X (1962-1963) il se sert de la bande de Möbius pour saisir comment l’extraction d’un objet supporte le cadre de la réalité fantasmatique du sujet. Et plus tard, dans son étude de Lol V. Stein (1965), il utilise le cross-cap pour situer l’objet a comme une partie du corps qui n’est pas spécularisable et qui est nécessaire en tant que support de l’image du corps: a → i(a).

NLS Congress presents

Lacan was always interested in topology, because he found in this discipline three-dimensional models for thinking about the difficult question of the bodily effects of language. Nevertheless, his focus was not always the same. As the questions that preoccupied him changed over the years, he used different figures. In his Seminar IX (1961-1962) he used the torus to explain how desire is shaped by a double lack in the confrontation between need and demand. In his Seminar X (1962-1963) he used the Möbius strip to grasp how an extracted object supports the framework of the subject’s phantasmatic reality. And later, in his study of Lol V. Stein (1965), he took the crosscap to situate the object a, as a bodily point that cannot be reflected in the mirror, and that is necessary as a support for the body image: a →  i(a).
 
This unnamable point where inside and outside invert is exactly the point that Anish Kapoor’s art challenges. This very interesting contemporary artist examines the same Lacanian theme of the topology of the body in abstract terms. Consider for example his work Descent into limbo, where he created the blackest hole as possible. “It reads not like a hole in the ground, but like a black carpet sitting on the floor. It is not an empty dark space, but a space full of darkness,” [1] he said. Or consider My Body Your Body where the border between inside and outside becomes problematic. “I’m endlessly obsessed with the question of the interior,” he said. [2] Or: “I'm not interested in self reference, I couldn’t imagine anything more horrible.” [3] His work is not about the ego, but about the impact of language on the body. Indeed, an analysis taken far enough – Anish Kapoor doesn’t make any secret of his own 25-year analysis – can create a distance from what has been one’s horror and can to a certain extent answer the question of how the body is shaped by language.
 
Revised by Joanne Conway

NLS Congrès présente

Lacan s’est toujours intéressé à la topologie car, grâce à celle-ci, il a pu isoler des modèles tridimensionnels pour penser la question complexe des effets corporels de la langue. Pourtant, ses références topologiques n’étaient pas toujours les mêmes. Au fil des années, à partir des questions qu’il abordait, il se servait de figures différentes. Dans son Séminaire IX (1961-1962) Lacan utilise le tore pour montrer que le désir est déterminé par un double manque dans l’articulation entre besoin et demande. Dans son Séminaire X (1962-1963) il se sert de la bande de Möbius pour saisir comment l’extraction d’un objet supporte le cadre de la réalité fantasmatique du sujet. Et plus tard, dans son étude de Lol V. Stein (1965), il utilise le cross-cap pour situer l’objet a comme une partie du corps qui n’est pas spécularisable et qui est nécessaire en tant que support de l’image du corps: a → i(a).